YassineForex Tester Online Review – The #1 Backtesting Platform in 2025!
Forex Tester Online review: building a historical practice session from project setup to results
In the Forex Tester Online video published on 20 July 2025, Yassine Geek works through a browser-based historical trading exercise. The tour covers project creation, chart tools, indicators, time navigation, simulated orders, reports and a prop challenge mode that was marked beta. This article explains the recorded workflow in detail, with timestamps for returning to each part of the demonstration. The virtual balance is practice money, not a funded brokerage balance. Prices, offers and feature status below are tied to the recording date; they should be checked against the current service before any purchase.
Why the review starts with historical simulation
Watch this chapter ↗ 00:53Yassine introduces the service as a way to practise trading decisions against historical market data. The distinction from watching the present market is control over time. A historical exercise can move through a selected period, pause while a decision is considered and advance without waiting for the next real-world session. That is the reason the review places playback and navigation tools at the center of the workflow. The software provides an environment in which a process can be examined, while the process itself still needs clearly stated rules.
The recording describes practice without risking real trading money inside the simulation. That does not mean the software subscription is free, and it does not mean a positive simulated result guarantees a live result. A useful exercise begins with an explicit question: which setup is being studied, over which period and with what decision rules? Keeping those choices stable makes the later report interpretable. Without that structure, moving quickly through an old chart can become an exercise in recognizing outcomes already visible in hindsight rather than testing the decisions that were available at the time.
Creating a project and choosing the virtual starting balance
Watch this chapter ↗ 02:35The project-creation segment selects instruments, enters a project name and gives the exercise a starting balance. Yassine uses a virtual amount of 20,000 dollars in the example and explicitly says that it cannot be withdrawn. That statement is worth retaining: the displayed balance belongs to a simulation, not to an account containing cash supplied by the service. The selected instruments include an example using euro-dollar, while the tour also mentions gold and shares among choices that can be explored.
A project name should make the exercise identifiable when returning to it later. Instead of using a vague label, describe the setup or research period in a way that can be linked to the resulting trades. The virtual balance is another project setting, not evidence of an account offer. If you compare two practice sessions, record their starting settings so that differences are not attributed solely to a strategy when the environments differ. The video demonstrates how to start the project, but it does not establish a standardized configuration appropriate for every instrument or every person using the platform.
The start date and time settings define the exercise
Watch this chapter ↗ 03:30Yassine chooses a historical start date and discusses options including the project time zone, session-close conventions and leverage. He then creates and runs the project. Later, he emphasizes that the chart is showing a historical year rather than the current year. This helps prevent a common misunderstanding: the candles in the practice workspace represent the selected historical period. A calendar position or project date should therefore be read as part of the simulation, not as a current market quotation.
Time settings are especially relevant when a practice rule refers to a session opening, a daily boundary or a particular hour. A different clock convention can change which candles appear to belong to the same day. Record the project settings together with the strategy notes, and keep them consistent when comparing sessions. The walkthrough shows that these choices are available, without resolving which convention a reader should use for a particular broker or instrument. The purpose of documenting them is to make the experiment reproducible and its resulting trades understandable when the project is opened again.
Drawing tools help preserve a chart-based hypothesis
Watch this chapter ↗ 04:33Once the project is running, the tour explores chart drawing tools. Yassine points to lines, rays and shapes, with examples including a trend line, a horizontal ray, a rectangle and a triangle. He also mentions arrows and visual markers. These controls provide a way to annotate what is being examined in the chart. Their practical role is not that a drawing guarantees an outcome, but that it makes the idea being studied visible and easier to compare with the later price sequence.
An annotation becomes more useful when it is placed with a reason and at a known stage of the exercise. If a level is part of the plan, mark it before advancing the simulation and record what would count as a relevant event. After the result is visible, avoid quietly moving the line to make the original idea look more precise. The review demonstrates the available visual workspace rather than a tested chart pattern. Clear annotations can support a documented process, while the research question and the decisions made during playback determine what the exercise actually investigates.
Timeframes and chart styles change the view, not the historical outcome
Watch this chapter ↗ 05:28The chart can be displayed as candles, a line or bars, and the tour mentions timeframes such as one minute, five minutes and fifteen minutes. Yassine later returns to these controls while reviewing the workspace. Changing the interval changes the way price observations are grouped, while changing the display style changes their visual representation. These are ways to inspect the exercise; they do not turn a historical trade into a new real-world opportunity or remove the need to understand the selected instrument.
For a consistent practice session, state which view belongs to the setup before using it to judge a decision. If a rule was defined on one timeframe, switching after the outcome becomes visible may alter the question being tested. Multiple views can still be useful when their roles are explicit, such as a broader context view and a separate decision view. The recording shows interface flexibility, not evidence that one chart style is inherently more profitable. Use the controls to make the information readable, and preserve the reasoning behind any changes in the session notes.
Indicators, settings and chart templates
Watch this chapter ↗ 06:06The indicator segment opens categories and searches for examples including MACD. Yassine describes adjusting settings such as levels, styles and colors, then applying the indicator. He also mentions using more than one indicator, uploading custom indicators and indicator templates. This explains how the workspace can be configured around the tools a person intends to study. The article does not assume that every custom indicator format is supported, because the recording does not test all import cases or provide a complete compatibility specification.
Record the settings used in an exercise, not only the indicator's name. Two sessions using different parameters can produce different signals even when both reports describe the same tool. A template can help retain a chart configuration, but it should be accompanied by a note about the rule being examined. Avoid adding indicators solely because a known historical move looks easier to explain with them. The demonstration is valuable for showing where configuration happens; it does not prove that the listed indicators predict price changes or that stacking them creates independent confirmation of a trading decision.
Jumping to historical moments is a navigation shortcut
Watch this chapter ↗ 07:00The Jump To area includes historical moments. Yassine mentions entries associated with major market periods and selects a pandemic-era example, after which the chart moves to that period. This is a convenient way to locate a segment of history without manually scrolling through every preceding candle. The tour also discusses entering a custom date. In both cases, the function changes the location of the simulation; it does not provide an independent explanation of why the market moved as it did.
A historical-event label can be used to define a research period, but the event name is not a complete market model. When practising around a known episode, write the question before examining the outcome and distinguish information available at the time from information learned later. Otherwise, choosing an event after knowing its famous price move can create a misleading test. The review illustrates the shortcut and its place in the workflow. It does not validate the historical labels as a trading signal or demonstrate that a strategy successful in one exceptional period will behave similarly in a different environment.
Session openings and the news filter add context
Watch this chapter ↗ 08:04Yassine explores jumping to trading sessions, mentioning Asian, London and New York openings. He then visits news-related controls and discusses filters by impact and region. These features make it easier to position a practice session around a time or event category relevant to the exercise. The recording shows navigation and filtering, rather than a complete audit of the news archive. It should not be taken to mean that every historical event or every regional release is represented with identical coverage.
The useful habit is to document how the session and news settings are being used. If a rule excludes a high-impact event period, write that exclusion before inspecting the resulting trades. If the purpose is to study a session opening, keep the project's time settings in view so the selected opening means the same thing across exercises. A filter organizes available information; it does not decide whether a trade should be opened or establish a future price direction. The software helps locate the context, while a clear research design determines what can be learned from it.
Simulated orders and the position list
Watch this chapter ↗ 09:40The order demonstration chooses buy or sell, enters volume and shows stop-loss and take-profit controls before placing a simulated order. The narration also refers to different order choices. The position list then displays information such as opening time, price, result and stop settings, with options to modify or close a position. Yassine mentions moving a stop toward break-even and shows access to cost-related fields. These actions belong to the historical exercise; they are not orders submitted through a live brokerage account.
Treat order settings as part of the test record. A planned stop or target should have a reason within the setup, and a later modification should be documented rather than hidden by the final result. The video does not compare simulated fills with the execution of a specific live broker, so this article does not present the exercise as an exact reproduction of all real-world costs or slippage. The tour's contribution is procedural: it connects the order ticket with the position list and subsequent statistics. That connection helps review how decisions during the session formed the recorded outcome.
Statistics make more sense when traced back to the exercise
Watch this chapter ↗ 11:16The report segment discusses winning and losing trades, long and short activity, symbol analysis, profit factor and the number of trading days or transactions. Yassine also points to views organized over periods such as weeks and months. The figures belong to the session record being demonstrated. They are not a published live performance history and should not be represented as a promise of what another person's account will earn. Their useful role is to summarize the decisions made inside the chosen project.
A meaningful interpretation returns to the project settings and the trades behind the summary. How many decisions were recorded? Which period was selected? Were the rules followed consistently, and were modifications written down? Different answers can change what the same headline figure means. The video provides a tour of the available reporting surfaces, not a completed validation study for a strategy. Use the report to identify a question worth examining in the chart and position history, while keeping the difference between a descriptive summary and evidence about future results clear.
Playback speed, shortcuts and event-based navigation
Watch this chapter ↗ 12:43The settings tour includes one-click trading, dark mode and keyboard shortcuts. Yassine then changes playback speed and points to moving backward or forward through bars. He also discusses advancing toward a price-related condition or other points of interest. Together, these controls are the part of the experience that differs most clearly from waiting for live markets: the user can pause, accelerate and move through the historical period according to the exercise being conducted.
Efficiency is useful only if the decision sequence remains understandable. Accelerating a quiet section can save time, while moving past a point where a rule required a decision can leave a gap in the test. Likewise, one-click controls reduce interface steps but make it more important to know which settings are active. The review does not recommend a universal speed or shortcut configuration. Choose a pace that allows the information used by the setup to be examined, and record any backward movement that changes what was known at the decision point. The aim is a traceable exercise, not merely the fastest route to a report.
Multiple charts, snapshots and sharing the project
Watch this chapter ↗ 14:27Yassine shows controls for hiding and showing indicators or drawing objects, then explores a layout with more than one chart. He chooses examples across different instrument categories and adjusts an indicator on one view. The tour also mentions screenshots and sharing a project. These functions can help keep an exercise organized when several views are needed, or when another person is being asked to review the same work. The recording demonstrates the options without testing every layout or sharing permission.
A multi-chart workspace is most useful when each chart has a stated role. Avoid treating additional screens as evidence in themselves; they may be displaying related information rather than independent confirmation. Snapshots can preserve what was visible at a decision point and can be linked with notes or a review question. Before sharing, check what the recipient will be able to see and whether the project includes information you intended to keep private. The article does not assume that a share link has any particular access restriction unless that restriction is confirmed in the current interface.
The prop challenge mode was shown as a beta feature
Watch this chapter ↗ 17:21The recording introduces a prop challenge option explicitly marked beta. Yassine describes selecting or entering conditions such as account size, minimum trading days, profit targets, daily loss and total loss. He then shows a task-style summary of progress. This makes the mode a practice framework for a set of evaluation rules. It does not create a real funded account, and successful completion in the simulator does not imply that a prop firm will approve a customer or pay out a real balance.
If the purpose is preparation for a particular evaluation, obtain that provider's current rules and compare their definitions with the simulator settings. A daily loss label may require more detail than a single percentage, especially around time boundaries and the treatment of open positions. The video uses examples rather than verifying an exact match with every provider mentioned. The helpful takeaway is that practice can be organized around explicit constraints. Keep the rules documented and avoid presenting the software's task indicators as a certificate that a future live challenge has already been passed.
Pricing, the description code and the final comparison
Watch this chapter ↗ 20:04The closing section compares paid options, including an annual plan and a lifetime offer. In the recording, Yassine discusses advertised and discounted figures and mentions a refund period. Those are dated purchase terms, not commitments made by this article. The description supplies the original affiliate URL and the code GK10YASS with a ten percent offer. A current buyer should confirm whether the code is accepted, which product it applies to, what the final charge includes and which refund conditions actually govern the checkout.
Yassine ends by contrasting this practice environment with demo accounts and other charting tools, emphasizing control over historical time and the depth of the exercise. That is a comparison made in the 2025 video, not a continuously updated ranking of every alternative. The software's appeal in the tour is the connected workflow from project settings through decisions to a report. Whether it fits your needs depends on those functions and the present subscription terms. This review is a commercial collaboration and the description link may generate a referral commission. No practice balance or positive simulation should be confused with cash that can be withdrawn or a guarantee of future live results.
Review links & sources
Explore the platform ↗This review is sponsored. I may earn a commission if you use the affiliate link from the video description.
Original video & source ↗THE ORIGINAL CHANNEL VIDEO
Watch the
full walkthrough.
This page brings together the original video and its topic collection. Watch on YouTube for the creator’s full presentation, demonstrations, and description.
Watch on YouTube
