YassineMyCryptoFunding Review I UP To 100% Profit Split I Lowest Commissions I 2hrs Payout Process
MyCryptoFunding review: two-step rules, platforms and the payment walkthrough
MyCryptoFunding is presented in this April 2025 video as a prop trading program with a strong crypto focus and access to other asset classes. The walkthrough covers the account table, two evaluation stages, funded-stage conditions, the browser platform and MetaTrader 5, costs, payout claims, scaling, restricted strategies and a checkout demonstration. Its most useful detail is the connection between selecting an account and understanding the rules that govern it. A larger displayed balance does not automatically create a larger usable risk budget, and a high advertised profit share does not describe every condition required to receive a payment. The recording focuses on a particular historical two-step offer. Current official pages also display other program types, so their rules should be read separately rather than combined into a single generic MyCryptoFunding account. This review follows the original workflow and explains how to turn the displayed numbers into practical decisions about exposure, platform choice and payment preparation. The central question is whether your ordinary trading process can operate within the exact account conditions. If it requires exploiting quotes, taking oversized risks or depending on a seasonal discount remaining active, the attractive headline figures are not enough to make the purchase a sound fit.
What the crypto-focused program actually offers
Watch this chapter ↗ 01:00The presenter introduces MyCryptoFunding as a prop firm focused on cryptocurrencies while also mentioning forex, indices, commodities and stocks. This broader instrument selection matters because a trader may follow several markets within one account. It does not mean that each instrument has identical sessions, margin requirements or transaction costs. A crypto position held over a weekend behaves operationally differently from an instrument tied to a conventional market schedule. Before choosing the program, list the symbols you actually use and check their specifications on the intended platform, including trade size, available hours and how costs are displayed.
The video cites a large collection of pairs and discusses account allocations up to a substantial nominal balance. Those are recorded coverage and account-size examples, not evidence that every pair remains available today. Current terms refer to simulated trading, which is an important distinction when interpreting the word funded. Understand what service is being purchased, which contractual conditions govern rewards, and whether any later stage uses a different agreement. A nominal account balance is not money you can withdraw on arrival. Its practical role is to define the scale against which targets, loss limits and permitted position sizes are calculated.
The recorded two-step evaluation
Watch this chapter ↗ 02:54The account table shown in the recording uses two stages. The first profit target is described as 8%, with a second-stage target of 5%. The daily loss allowance is shown as 5% and the overall allowance as 10%, alongside minimum trading days and no stated evaluation deadline in the presenter’s explanation. These conditions work together. Reaching the target is not enough if a rule was breached along the way, and being profitable at the end of a day does not erase an earlier equity violation. Read the measurement rules as carefully as the headline percentages.
For an illustrative nominal account of 10,000 units, an 8% target is 800 units and a 5% target is 500. The two stages are distinct tests rather than one uninterrupted climb to a combined target. Determine what resets when a new stage begins, which results carry over and how credentials are issued. The current official terms retain a two-step 8% and 5% structure, while current product pages also show alternatives. Select the relevant program first. A one-step target or trailing-loss rule appearing elsewhere on the site should not be imported into the historical two-step description or assumed to apply to the account in your cart.
Daily loss: the definition matters more than the label
Watch this chapter ↗ 03:37The daily drawdown line is one of the most consequential items in the table. A trader needs to know the reference amount, the reset time and whether floating losses and charges are included. An apparently simple 5% allowance can be misread if somebody assumes it measures only closed trades. Consider a day when closed positions are profitable but an open position has a large unrealized loss. If the rule monitors equity, the open loss may matter immediately. Do not use the end-of-session statement as a substitute for observing the live rule boundary during trading.
Translate the applicable daily rule into a visible account floor and maintain a buffer above it. That buffer has to cover spread changes, commissions, financing and movement during execution. If a strategy normally needs several positions open together, estimate their combined loss under a plausible adverse move rather than assigning each the entire remaining allowance. Also check what happens across the daily reset. A position held through that point may interact with a new reference differently from a position opened afterward. These operational details decide whether your normal process fits the account, and they are best clarified before placing the first evaluation trade.
Overall loss and the risk budget behind an account size
Watch this chapter ↗ 03:47The recording’s overall 10% loss figure deserves its own reading, separate from the daily allowance. On an illustrative 10,000-unit account, a fixed 10% allowance would correspond to 1,000 units, subject to the precise contractual definition. That is the budget relevant to survival, not the full nominal balance. A position that risks a seemingly modest share of the displayed account may still consume a large portion of the available loss room. Design position sizes from the usable buffer and the strategy’s possible sequence of losses, then check the nominal percentage as a secondary measure.
Current MyCryptoFunding materials also describe trailing-loss products. A trailing boundary can rise as the account reaches a new reference high, unlike a fixed boundary tied to the original balance. This difference can change the effect of giving back earlier gains. Keep a separate rule sheet for each product rather than treating all programs as interchangeable. If you switch from a two-step offer to an instant or one-step option, rebuild the risk plan around its own drawdown method. The lower number is not the only comparison that matters; the way the floor moves and the values used to calculate it can be equally important.
Minimum activity and the funded-stage transition
Watch this chapter ↗ 04:26The presenter distinguishes the second evaluation phase from the later funded stage and discusses minimum days in both contexts. He describes a starting profit share of 80%, with the headline up to 100% reached through additional progression rather than automatically attached to every new account. This is a useful correction to reading the title alone. Check when the share changes, what performance requirements apply and whether any optional feature changes it. The percentage attached to your initial agreement should be the basis of your calculation, not the maximum available somewhere in the program.
A minimum-day condition requires a definition of a qualifying day. Opening a trivial position merely to add a calendar date may not satisfy the relevant rules, and forcing trades after reaching a target can add unnecessary risk. Keep the normal process, reduce exposure when the objective is already met, and clarify any required activity with the applicable documents. Current options distinguish standard and on-demand arrangements, so activity and payout rules can depend on selection. Passing evaluation, activating a funded-stage account, becoming eligible to request a payment and actually receiving it are separate events. Plan the transition as a sequence rather than assuming everything occurs when the target line turns green.
Browser platform or MetaTrader 5
Watch this chapter ↗ 06:13The video shows a choice between the MCF browser platform and MetaTrader 5 and describes the browser option as accessible without installing a separate trading program. The selection should follow your actual workflow. A browser interface can be convenient for manual chart review and order entry, while an established desktop environment may suit a trader already familiar with its controls. Familiarity reduces operational mistakes, but it should not replace a check of the account’s available symbols and order functions. Confirm that the platform supports the way you ordinarily enter, modify and close positions.
Before committing to a live evaluation, rehearse practical actions in any available practice environment: placing a protective stop, changing position size, closing part of a position and locating the account’s equity. Know what happens if the connection drops or the browser tab closes. Also distinguish platform capability from program permission. A terminal may support automation or copying technically, while the account rules restrict particular uses. Choosing MetaTrader does not grant unrestricted access to every strategy the software can run. The platform decision is strongest when it follows a written list of required functions and a separate reading of allowed trading behavior.
Commissions and the complete cost of a trade
Watch this chapter ↗ 07:15The presenter praises crypto commissions and states a per-side figure in the recording, although the auto-caption formatting is not clear enough to make that isolated wording a dependable current fee schedule. The practical comparison is the full cost of entering and exiting your usual position. Determine the charged rate, its calculation basis and whether the quoted amount applies to one side or a complete round trip. Spread and any holding cost belong in the same calculation. A low commission label can be outweighed by wider execution costs on the instruments you actually trade.
Run the comparison using typical position sizes and holding periods. A frequent strategy pays entry and exit costs repeatedly, so a small fee difference can affect whether its average gross gain remains meaningful after costs. A longer-held strategy may care more about financing and market gaps. Keep these estimates separate from challenge purchase fees: one is a cost of accessing the program, while the other affects trading results and the remaining loss buffer. Read the instrument specification on the selected platform rather than assuming the homepage’s general low-cost claim applies identically across crypto, forex and the other asset classes mentioned in the video.
Payout speed, profit share and refund timing
Watch this chapter ↗ 07:41The title and walkthrough emphasize a two-hour payout process. Treat this as the recorded provider claim about processing, not a demonstrated personal withdrawal by the presenter. A payment request can involve eligibility checks, review and transfer settlement, and those stages do not necessarily share a single clock. Ask when the quoted period starts, whether it concerns approval or receipt, and which events pause it. A displayed example of somebody else’s payout can show how the company presents a transaction, but it does not establish the timing or approval outcome of your future request.
The refund discussion is more specific: the presenter links the historical challenge-fee refund to the first payout rather than merely to passing the evaluation. That distinction changes the economics of the purchase. A trader who passes but never reaches a valid first payment should not assume the access fee has already been returned. Calculate the initial outlay as money at risk and consider a refund only when its conditions are fulfilled. Likewise, apply the agreed profit share to eligible profit rather than to every positive number shown on the dashboard. The relevant terms may treat disallowed activity differently from ordinary trading performance.
Dashboard statistics and scaling beyond the headline
Watch this chapter ↗ 08:30The recording points to dashboard features such as live parameter tracking, journaling, performance analysis, news and a heat map. These tools can make the challenge easier to monitor if you use them to review decisions rather than only celebrate profitable days. Track exposure, remaining loss room, costs and the reasons behind entries. A journal that records why you took a trade and what would invalidate it is more useful than a list of profits without context. When the account approaches a rule boundary, the risk display deserves more attention than the target progress bar.
The scaling segment describes eligibility after sustained performance and a route toward larger allocations. Regard the large eventual limit as a possible progression ceiling, not as the initial service delivered by checkout. Write down the review period, required profit, loss behavior and conditions for increasing the account. Consider whether trading size grows proportionally and whether the strategy remains executable at the next level. More nominal capital does not repair inconsistent risk management. A meaningful scaling plan rewards a process that has already worked under the rules; it should not encourage taking exceptional risk in the current account to reach a distant advertised maximum faster.
Restricted strategies and the difference between flexibility and permission
Watch this chapter ↗ 11:36The video’s rules segment discusses high-frequency activity, latency arbitrage and exploiting pricing or server delays. It also mentions a profit cap applied to a single trade or day in the recorded explanation. These restrictions matter even when the provider describes news trading, weekend trading or evaluation timing as flexible. Flexibility in one dimension does not remove controls in another. Read the strategy definitions and think about how your trades would appear in an account review. A system that earns primarily from stale quotes is a different case from ordinary discretionary trading that happens to be short in duration.
If your process relies on automation, multiple accounts or copying, seek the exact applicable policy before purchase. Avoid relying on a general social-media response that omits the account type or funded stage. Save a written explanation of any ambiguous practice with its date and the precise question asked. Current terms describe simulated activity and provider measures around sustainability, so broad marketing phrases such as unlimited or zero personal risk need to be interpreted alongside the agreement. The access fee, time spent and eligibility for rewards still matter. The useful decision is whether the contract permits your established process without changing it into something built only to exploit an evaluation.
The recorded checkout and crypto invoice
Watch this chapter ↗ 12:56The practical demonstration starts with registration details, account and platform selection, then moves to buying an example account. The presenter chooses the MCF interface and a large account, applies EASTER15, and shows a reduced historical invoice. That seasonal code belongs to the original description and recording. Check whether a code is accepted at today’s checkout and inspect the final total; an old demonstration cannot guarantee a present discount. Confirm the chosen program, nominal account size, platform and any extras before payment. A successful coupon entry does not verify that every other selection matches what you intended to buy.
The crypto payment screen shows a gateway, a selected network, an address or QR code and a time window. Match the payment asset and network exactly, check the amount and account for the sending service’s withdrawal fee. Sending the right asset through the wrong network is not the same as paying the invoice. Keep the order reference and transaction identifier so that an unresolved payment can be traced. The walkthrough explains that credentials and dashboard access follow confirmation, but reaching an invoice is distinct from completing the transfer. Verify activation afterward and protect the account details delivered by email before starting to trade.
A practical fit check before buying
Watch this chapter ↗ 15:24The closing segment points viewers to social channels, community links and support. These are useful for finding official updates and asking operational questions, but follower totals and historical review scores do not settle the account contract. Prepare a short set of questions tied to your process: the drawdown calculation, qualifying days, permitted automation, typical instrument costs and the exact payout route. Clear answers are more valuable than a general statement that the program is safe or suitable worldwide. Check eligibility for your location and chosen payment method at the current purchase stage rather than adopting the recording’s broad availability language as a permanent promise.
MyCryptoFunding’s historical offer is most relevant to a trader who wants crypto-oriented instruments and can work within a structured evaluation. Compare it with your own recent trading record using the applicable loss rules and realistic costs. Estimate whether normal losing sequences fit the buffer and whether your profitable days satisfy the payout conditions. Choose the smallest allocation that lets you assess the workflow meaningfully within your budget. The strongest reason to proceed is a compatible process and a clear agreement. A large maximum split, a fast processing slogan or a seasonal coupon can improve an offer’s presentation, but none substitutes for that underlying fit.
Review links & sources
Explore the platform ↗This review is sponsored. Based on the April 30, 2025 walkthrough, original description and recovered Arabic auto captions, with official program and terms references researched separately. Account sizes, prices, EASTER15, instrument counts, commission wording, scaling and payout-speed claims belong to the recorded offer unless explicitly identified as current documentation. The original product homepage is preserved; it contains no invented affiliate identifier. The video reaches a crypto payment invoice but does not establish a completed challenge or the creator receiving a payout. Current official pages describe additional products and contain broad marketing language alongside simulated-trading terms; the selected account agreement and applicable rules require particular attention.
Original video & source ↗THE ORIGINAL CHANNEL VIDEO
Watch the
full walkthrough.
This page brings together the original video and its topic collection. Watch on YouTube for the creator’s full presentation, demonstrations, and description.
Watch on YouTube
