YassineBravoos - The Next Generation of wallets made for an intuitive and safe start in crypto! #2
Braavos part two: the historical STRK raffle, Pro Score and smart-wallet security
Yassine Geeks second Braavos video was published on 16 February 2024, during a period of intense interest in Starknet token distribution. It introduces a STRK raffle, a wallet activity score, a dApp gallery and a security story involving a public challenge. The presentation is enthusiastic and time-sensitive, so dates are essential to a responsible reading. The official raffle page now explicitly says the event ended on 14 April 2024 at 23:59 UTC. Nothing in this article asks a reader to participate in that old promotion or promises an airdrop. Instead, it explains the historical workflow and the distinctions behind it: a wallet account is not the same as a person, an activity score is not an allocation guarantee, and a public security challenge is not proof of absolute invulnerability. The original Braavos homepage address is retained exactly from the description. Clear narration is followed by timestamp, while current primary sources are used to establish the event closure and clarify the specific challenge the presenter mentions.
The raffle announcement is a dated event, not a permanent wallet feature
Watch this chapter ↗ 00:27At approximately 00:27 the presenter introduces an event announced on 13 February. He describes a raffle associated with one million STRK tokens and more than 25,000 community roles. The key point is the scale of the pool being promoted, not a promise that every participant receives a million tokens. Around 01:04 he outlines a short route: download Braavos, connect the wallet, confirm and spin. He then gives examples of differing token amounts depending on luck. The recording is therefore describing a promotional draw with variable outcomes, rather than a fixed payment for installing an application.
The official Braavos page provides the decisive current clarification: participation has ended. Its notice gives 14 April 2024 at 23:59 UTC as the closing time. The historical article and its original event terms remain useful sources, but their availability does not reopen the competition. This matters because an archived review can still circulate long after a campaign has finished. A reader should not be encouraged to connect to an old interface merely because the video speaks in the present tense. The date attached to the source changes how its instructions should be interpreted.
The original description links both the Braavos homepage and the dedicated raffle article. These destinations serve different purposes. The homepage identifies the wallet product, while the dated article describes an event with its own terms. Keeping them separate preserves a useful product reference without presenting a closed promotion as current. If a newer event appears, it needs its own announcement and conditions. A similarly named prize page or a message from an unknown account cannot inherit authenticity or eligibility from the February 2024 video.
One account, another spin and the limits of the narration
Watch this chapter ↗ 02:00From about 02:00 the presenter returns to the raffle and says it is open to ordinary users as well as people interested in airdrops. At approximately 02:21 he explains one chance per account, then discusses multiple accounts and a possible second chance if certain criteria are met. He directs viewers to announcements on the projects Twitter account. These are historical instructions as narrated. They should not be converted into a current strategy for creating accounts or bypassing an events rules. The legal terms, not a shortened explanation, determine what participation is permitted.
The official event page clarifies the historical bonus criteria, including a Pro Score above 70% or receipt of at least 100 STRK directly from the Starknet airdrop. This is a separate threshold from the presenters later suggestion to aim for a 90% activity score. Confusing the two would distort the explanation. One concerns an extra chance in a particular raffle; the other is a general activity target promoted during the tour. Both are dated to the event context and neither gives a reader a present claim to a reward.
The distinction between account and person also matters. A blockchain address can be a technical account identifier without demonstrating a unique human participant. Campaign organisers may apply eligibility rules beyond a visible counter. The video does not reproduce the complete legal text, and this article does not infer unlimited rights from the phrase one chance per account. A useful historical reading records the mechanism, the referenced criteria and the need for the original terms. A present reader can learn how such promotions are structured without spending fees on a closed draw or assuming that more accounts necessarily means valid participation.
Downloading the wallet and connecting are separate from signing
Watch this chapter ↗ 03:41Around 03:41 the presenter explains that Braavos can be installed as a desktop browser extension, naming Chrome, Edge and Firefox, or as a mobile application through the relevant Android and iOS stores. This is a product-access portion of the video rather than a reward claim. The app or extension is the interface through which a user manages an account and interacts with applications. Installing it, creating or recovering an account, connecting to a website and authorising a transaction are distinct stages. A beginner should not treat them as one undifferentiated click sequence.
Connection normally lets an application identify the selected account and request interactions; a signature or transaction request has its own content. Read what the wallet asks to authorise before confirming. The video uses connect and confirm language in the raffle explanation, but that does not justify approving any request from any site carrying similar branding. Use the official download route to identify the publisher and the intended application domain. This is practical context for the installation passage, not a claim that the presenter performed a phishing test or that the article verified every browser package.
Before recovering an existing account, understand which device and recovery method belong to it. Do not create a new account and assume it contains funds associated with an earlier address. Keep the network identity visible because Braavos discussion here concerns Starknet. A familiar token ticker on another chain does not imply the same balance. The installation segment is most useful when it gives a reader a clear map of interfaces and actions. It should help the user slow down at the signature boundary, where a website interaction can become an actual on-chain instruction.
Starknet Pro Score is an activity view, not an airdrop contract
Watch this chapter ↗ 04:10At approximately 04:10 the presenter introduces Starknet Pro Score and describes it as an overview of activity in Starknet, accessible on desktop or mobile through Braavos. Around 04:48 he suggests aiming for 90% to improve potential airdrop prospects. That is his historical suggestion. The recording does not establish that Starknet used this score as the sole eligibility formula, or that reaching the suggested percentage guaranteed a token allocation. An activity dashboard and an issuer-defined distribution rule are different systems even when both concern the same network.
Later, around 05:32, the presenter points to a guide explaining how the score is calculated. Such a guide can help a user understand the dashboard, but it is still important to identify its author, version and scope. In the present source check, the original Pro Score address in the description displays Ledger-related content rather than the historical score explanation. It cannot therefore be used here to confirm todays score formula. This is a specific source limitation. The historical narration remains available, while the old page route no longer supplies the evidence its name appears to promise.
A useful interpretation of any activity score starts by asking what it measures. Counts of interactions, time periods, balances and application diversity would represent different behaviours; the actual formula must be documented before claiming which apply. A higher score can indicate more recorded activity without indicating better investment judgement or lower risk. Avoid paying transaction fees solely to imitate a target percentage whose relationship to a future reward is unknown. The video introduces a convenient view of an account, but the article preserves the boundary between observing past actions and promising a future allocation.
The dApp gallery and the mySwap reference
Watch this chapter ↗ 03:21At around 03:21 the presenter points to a Twitter post concerning mySwap and invites viewers to inspect it. He then discusses connecting Braavos to applications. From roughly 05:00 he describes a protocol list or dApp gallery and says the wallet can connect to applications through a browser or mobile interface. The recoverable content is a discovery workflow: the wallet provides a way to find services rather than requiring the user to remember every website separately. The recording does not document a completed swap with its input amount, received amount and total cost.
A gallery entry is a route to an application, not an assurance that every transaction is suitable. A swap involves an asset pair, a quoted output, a tolerance for price movement and network execution. The user should understand those elements before signing. The article does not assign current fees or supported pairs to mySwap because the video does not establish them and the current review scope is the wallet tour. This keeps the example concrete without expanding a named protocol into an invented step-by-step transaction that the presenter did not show in the supplied narration.
When using an application discovered through a wallet, verify the account, network and assets in the actual request. A token approval, a swap and a liquidity contribution are different operations. Keep a record of the transaction identifier after execution rather than treating a success animation as complete evidence of the final balance. These are practical distinctions prompted by the gallery section. They do not imply that this article performed those transactions. The historical feature is useful because it organises access; the user still needs to evaluate the specific operation and application reached through it.
Market-share figures and a financing prediction
Watch this chapter ↗ 05:59From approximately 05:59 the presenter compares Braavos with Argent and points to data about smart-contract wallets. Around 06:34 he says Braavos reached a 38% share in about eighteen months. He also refers to ten million dollars of early funding and speculates about a future financing round worth eighty to one hundred and twenty million dollars. These are different kinds of claims: a historical market statistic, a stated funding amount and a forecast. This article attributes them to the narration and does not report the forecast as an event that actually happened.
The market-share statement needs a denominator and a date to be meaningful. It might concern accounts, transactions or another measured population; the supplied captions do not reproduce the full methodology. A percentage should therefore not be presented as share of all crypto wallets worldwide. The video is discussing a Starknet smart-wallet comparison. Likewise, an announced financing amount is not automatically a token holders entitlement or a measure of funds available to repay every loss. Readers should identify which company received capital and under what arrangement before drawing an economic connection to their own account.
A comparison between wallets is most useful when it connects to a concrete need: account recovery, signing controls, application compatibility or the way a device is used. Popularity can suggest where support and integrations may be found, but it does not prove that the less popular interface is unsafe or that the more popular one cannot fail. The presenters enthusiastic ranking is an opinion within the review. The reader can acknowledge the historical adoption story while selecting a wallet according to documented behaviour and their own requirements, rather than treating an uncertain funding prediction as technical evidence.
Capture the Flag: a specific demonstration of a security design
Watch this chapter ↗ 07:00At approximately 07:00 the presenter discusses a Capture the Flag challenge, saying Braavos revealed a seed phrase for an account containing more than 150,000 USDC and challenged participants to move the funds. He says the challenge was not successfully broken. This is the security story used in the video to explain why some users might prefer Braavos. The official challenge page identifies a February 2024 test involving a particular Cairo2 account contract protected by Hardware Signer 2FA. The source is useful for narrowing the claim to a specific setup rather than a universal assertion about all wallets.
The design idea is that possession of one secret need not be sufficient to authorise a transaction if the account requires another signer or factor. Current Braavos security information describes biometric multifactor controls and a self-custody model. Those are product claims that should be understood with the actual account configuration and recovery process. This article does not reproduce the public challenge seed phrase, attempt an exploit or independently audit the code. It also does not infer that a demonstration conducted for a short period eliminates every possible vulnerability or operational mistake.
Security evidence has scope. A challenge concerns its defined account and conditions; an audit concerns identified code; a users everyday safety also depends on device control and the requests they approve. A protective signer cannot make an unwanted transaction desirable if the user knowingly authorises it. The most useful lesson from this section is therefore to understand the extra authorisation requirement and its recovery implications. Keep the strong marketing conclusion separate from the narrower technical demonstration. That makes the security story understandable without turning it into either a promise of invulnerability or a dismissal of the feature.
A smart wallet still needs a clear recovery and usage plan
Watch this chapter ↗ 07:55Near 07:55 the presenter mentions a strategic partnership and closes by encouraging viewers to inspect the event links. The language suggests urgency around a second opportunity associated with the Starknet distribution period. For a present reader, that urgency belongs to February 2024. The closed raffle and changed Pro Score page make it especially important to use the recording as an archive. The homepage remains a reference to the product, while the event and activity links need their own dated interpretation.
The enduring wallet question is how the account is controlled and recovered. If additional devices or signers are configured, understand what happens when a phone is lost, a computer is replaced or access to a factor is interrupted. Keep the official instructions for the specific account type rather than assuming that every smart-wallet arrangement follows the same process. This article does not prescribe an unverified recovery sequence, and the video does not supply one in full. A reader can use its security discussion as a prompt to learn the actual configuration before relying on it for valuable assets.
Braavos part two is most informative as a record of a particular moment: a STRK promotional draw, interest in activity scoring, a gallery of applications and a public security demonstration. Separate those components when reading it. The raffle ended, the score did not guarantee an allocation, the gallery did not validate every protocol, and the challenge concerned a defined account design. The product can still be researched through current official materials, but historical figures and urgent invitations should not become present guarantees. This preserves the useful explanations in Yassine Geeks video while avoiding invented rewards, personal tests or promises that the sources do not support.
Review links & sources
Explore the platform ↗This review is sponsored. Based on the February 2024 video description and automatic Arabic transcript. The official raffle page now states that participation ended on 14 April 2024 at 23:59 UTC; this article is historical, not an invitation to enter. Market-share figures and funding forecasts are attributed to the presenter. The original Pro Score URL currently displays unrelated Ledger material, so it is not used to validate that historical feature. The original Braavos homepage link is preserved exactly.
Original video & source ↗THE ORIGINAL CHANNEL VIDEO
Watch the
full walkthrough.
This page brings together the original video and its topic collection. Watch on YouTube for the creator’s full presentation, demonstrations, and description.
Watch on YouTube
